Blades
Please be warned this comparison is biased
toward HP. For our un-biased
comparison please click
HP vs IBM Blades toughest problems
facing today’s IT infrastructures – cost, time, energy and change. Plus, it
includes flexibility, scalability and support for future technologies
to help your
business take full advantage of new things to come. and design standards as the market
leading HP Proliant servers, including hot-plug hard-drives, multiple I/O cards,
multi-function network interconnects and Integrated Lights Out.
Please post your requests, comments,
opinion, concern, and read other
readers comments at our
Hardware Comparison
forum.
Copyright © 2007 ITComparison Team. All
Rights Reserved
Contact
us: admin@ITComparison.com
Please Read our
Disclaimer
Call us: 1-800-coming-soon
HP VS IBM Blades (HP Biased)
Fact 1: HP BladeSystem c-Class
infrastructure offers flexibility and scalability, requires no compromise.
![]()
![]()
HP
BladeSystem c-Class is revolutionary – a breakthrough in blade
architecture to meet the requirements of the next-generation
datacenter:
Fact 2: HP BladeSystem c-Class offers
customers an unmatched level of infrastructure in a 10U space as compared
to IBM.[1]
![]()
HP c7000
IBM BladeCenter H
Cooling
No compromise:
performance and
redundancy
Compromise:
performance or
redundancy
Mid-plane Bandwidth
Ample headroom: 5 Tb/s
2 Tb/s
Interconnect Bays
Flexible:
20 Gb/s (8)
or
40 Gb/s (4)
Rigid:
10 Gb/s (2)
and
4 Gb/s legacy (2)
and
2 bridge modules
InfiniBand
High performance:
20 Gb/s; DDR
10 Gb/s;
SDR
Diagnosis
Clear: LCD Display
Cryptic: LED lights
Bottom line: The HP
BladeSystem c7000 Enclosure is designed to tackle the
![]()
![]()
Fact 3: HP delivers unmatched capabilities with the BL460c and BL480c
server
blades.[2]
![]()
HP BL460c
HP BL480c
IBM HS21 w/ more memory AND more
storage
IBM HS21 w/ more memory
IBM HS21
Max Servers per Enclosure
16
8
4
7
14
Max Memory
8DIMMs/32GB
12DIMMs/48GB
8DIMMs/32GB
8DIMMs/32GB
4DIMMs/16GB
Internal Storage
2 hot-plug
drives
4 hot-plug
drives
3 hot-plug
drives and 2 non-hot plug drives
2 non
hot-plug drives
2 non
hot-plug drives
RAID
RAID 0/1
controller with battery backed cache option
RAID 0/1/5
controller with battery backed cache option
RAID 0/1E/5,
no battery backed cache
RAID 0/1, no
battery backed cache
RAID 0/1, no
battery backed cache
Max NICs
8
16
8
8
4
Bottom line: No compromise,
Proliant c-Class server blades share the same enterprise-class features
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fact 4: HP BladeSystem offers investment
protection without sacrificing innovation.[3]
![]()
![]()
With the new
HP BladeSystem c-Class, we left the competition behind. However we do
realize that some customers may want to continue with their existing
products and move forward at their own pace. Therefore, HP has
protected the investments of our existing HP BladeSystem p-Class
customers with:
![]()
IBM, on the other
hand, may offer backward compatibility BUT only at the cost of keeping
backward features. Why pay for what you can’t use? Existing blades may
plug into the new chassis, but with limited functionality. Customers won’t
be able to take advantage of new chassis features e.g., additional
bandwidth.
![]()




























